<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To Upgrade or Not to Upgrade…That is the Windows 7 Question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://partnerit.com/2009/09/to-upgrade-or-not-to-upgrade%e2%80%a6that-is-the-windows-7-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://partnerit.com/2009/09/to-upgrade-or-not-to-upgrade%e2%80%a6that-is-the-windows-7-question/</link>
	<description>Business, Technology and Staffing insights from RSA Corp.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:06:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greg Crawford</title>
		<link>http://partnerit.com/2009/09/to-upgrade-or-not-to-upgrade%e2%80%a6that-is-the-windows-7-question/comment-page-1/#comment-4130</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://partnerit.com/?p=216#comment-4130</guid>
		<description>Hello Bruce!
7 uses the same kernel as Vista, which is completely rewritten from XP. That being said, I am comfortable saying that 7 is what Vista should have been. The kernel is solid but it&#039;s implementation in Vista was not ideal. Microsoft clearly did significant work to improve performance and usability and has produced a product that is a worthy successor to XP. My experience is that 7 is hands down faster and more usable and reliable than Vista despite sharing Vista&#039;s DNA. Memory utilization is improved and the core components have been streamlined to load faster and require fewer system resources. As to upgrading from Vista, it depends on your version. Check this link for more information &lt;span style=&quot;text-color:#ffffff;&quot;&gt;http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/help/upgrading-from-windows-vista-to-windows-7&lt;/span&gt;
And at the risk of opening a can of worms, I will clarify my earlier statement about upgrades to this: There is currently no supported method of upgrading from XP to 7 that retains setting and applications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Bruce!<br />
7 uses the same kernel as Vista, which is completely rewritten from XP. That being said, I am comfortable saying that 7 is what Vista should have been. The kernel is solid but it&#8217;s implementation in Vista was not ideal. Microsoft clearly did significant work to improve performance and usability and has produced a product that is a worthy successor to XP. My experience is that 7 is hands down faster and more usable and reliable than Vista despite sharing Vista&#8217;s DNA. Memory utilization is improved and the core components have been streamlined to load faster and require fewer system resources. As to upgrading from Vista, it depends on your version. Check this link for more information <span style="text-color:#ffffff;"><a href="http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/help/upgrading-from-windows-vista-to-windows-7" rel="nofollow">http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/help/upgrading-from-windows-vista-to-windows-7</a></span><br />
And at the risk of opening a can of worms, I will clarify my earlier statement about upgrades to this: There is currently no supported method of upgrading from XP to 7 that retains setting and applications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Oliver</title>
		<link>http://partnerit.com/2009/09/to-upgrade-or-not-to-upgrade%e2%80%a6that-is-the-windows-7-question/comment-page-1/#comment-4125</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://partnerit.com/?p=216#comment-4125</guid>
		<description>Greg, I heard (from an IT dude) that Win 7 was really Vista with some enhanced display modifications that slightly improve performance over Vista.  This was somewhat contrary to the reports I had been hearing about its great performance over Vista.  Most of your comparitive comments have been toward Win 7 vs XP.  Is it faster significantly than Vista?  Is it as much of a memory hog as Vista?  If I wanted to upgrade, are you saying that you can&#039;t upgrade and you have to start from scratch with a new install of Win 7?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg, I heard (from an IT dude) that Win 7 was really Vista with some enhanced display modifications that slightly improve performance over Vista.  This was somewhat contrary to the reports I had been hearing about its great performance over Vista.  Most of your comparitive comments have been toward Win 7 vs XP.  Is it faster significantly than Vista?  Is it as much of a memory hog as Vista?  If I wanted to upgrade, are you saying that you can&#8217;t upgrade and you have to start from scratch with a new install of Win 7?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Crawford</title>
		<link>http://partnerit.com/2009/09/to-upgrade-or-not-to-upgrade%e2%80%a6that-is-the-windows-7-question/comment-page-1/#comment-3943</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://partnerit.com/?p=216#comment-3943</guid>
		<description>Martin,

There is a performance benefit for 64 bit computing. Moving to 64 bit will ensure the best compatability in the long term, but there may be challenges in the short term. Windows 7 provides ways to work around those challenges, but you just need to be aware that from time to time you may - for example - need to open certain Web sites in the 32 bit version of IE and not the 64 bit version. 

Windows 7 also has a compatability mode that can be applied to applications that either do not work and play well with windows 7 or with a 64 bit OS. To stack the deck in favor of a positive experience, I would do some due diligence:

-Make sure you do indeed have a 64 bit processor
-Make sure all your applications will function under windows 7, or that updates are available
-Make sure your hardware (printers, etc.) offers windows 7 or Vista 64 bit drivers.
-Make sure you have access to the installation media for all your applications.

You should also be aware that there is not an official direct upgrade path and that installing either version of windows 7 will require a reinstall of all applications. And as always make sure you get a good backup before pulling the trigger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin,</p>
<p>There is a performance benefit for 64 bit computing. Moving to 64 bit will ensure the best compatability in the long term, but there may be challenges in the short term. Windows 7 provides ways to work around those challenges, but you just need to be aware that from time to time you may &#8211; for example &#8211; need to open certain Web sites in the 32 bit version of IE and not the 64 bit version. </p>
<p>Windows 7 also has a compatability mode that can be applied to applications that either do not work and play well with windows 7 or with a 64 bit OS. To stack the deck in favor of a positive experience, I would do some due diligence:</p>
<p>-Make sure you do indeed have a 64 bit processor<br />
-Make sure all your applications will function under windows 7, or that updates are available<br />
-Make sure your hardware (printers, etc.) offers windows 7 or Vista 64 bit drivers.<br />
-Make sure you have access to the installation media for all your applications.</p>
<p>You should also be aware that there is not an official direct upgrade path and that installing either version of windows 7 will require a reinstall of all applications. And as always make sure you get a good backup before pulling the trigger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Meyer</title>
		<link>http://partnerit.com/2009/09/to-upgrade-or-not-to-upgrade%e2%80%a6that-is-the-windows-7-question/comment-page-1/#comment-3934</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Meyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://partnerit.com/?p=216#comment-3934</guid>
		<description>I have been thinking of upgrading to 7, but have been reluctant to since my XP seems to be working fine.  My son who is more technically oriented than I says I should upgrade from 32 bit to 64 bit what is your take on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been thinking of upgrading to 7, but have been reluctant to since my XP seems to be working fine.  My son who is more technically oriented than I says I should upgrade from 32 bit to 64 bit what is your take on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felicia</title>
		<link>http://partnerit.com/2009/09/to-upgrade-or-not-to-upgrade%e2%80%a6that-is-the-windows-7-question/comment-page-1/#comment-3931</link>
		<dc:creator>Felicia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://partnerit.com/?p=216#comment-3931</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t wait to get it on my work laptop - unfortunately our VPN client is a bit behind in that because we&#039;d have to uprade the equipment to get the new client to work.  Good post Greg!  Love you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t wait to get it on my work laptop &#8211; unfortunately our VPN client is a bit behind in that because we&#8217;d have to uprade the equipment to get the new client to work.  Good post Greg!  Love you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Sweeney</title>
		<link>http://partnerit.com/2009/09/to-upgrade-or-not-to-upgrade%e2%80%a6that-is-the-windows-7-question/comment-page-1/#comment-3749</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Sweeney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://partnerit.com/?p=216#comment-3749</guid>
		<description>Amrou, my show desktop button is on the far right of the taskbar, to the right of the system tray.  I don&#039;t find it obtrusive.  Is yours somewhere more obtrusive?

Greg, great post.  I&#039;m enjoying my Windows 7 install.  Much much better than my wife&#039;s Vista.  Much faster than my old XP install and this is on a 5 year old laptop.  I am particularly impressed with the system performance and boot times.  Most of my gripes relate to Office 2007 and the changed keyboard shortcuts in Excel.  I&#039;m still trying to find old commands on the new menu ribbons.  Productivity has definitely slowed for me in that department.  And your glasses are certainly sharp.  Stick with that look!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amrou, my show desktop button is on the far right of the taskbar, to the right of the system tray.  I don&#8217;t find it obtrusive.  Is yours somewhere more obtrusive?</p>
<p>Greg, great post.  I&#8217;m enjoying my Windows 7 install.  Much much better than my wife&#8217;s Vista.  Much faster than my old XP install and this is on a 5 year old laptop.  I am particularly impressed with the system performance and boot times.  Most of my gripes relate to Office 2007 and the changed keyboard shortcuts in Excel.  I&#8217;m still trying to find old commands on the new menu ribbons.  Productivity has definitely slowed for me in that department.  And your glasses are certainly sharp.  Stick with that look!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amrou</title>
		<link>http://partnerit.com/2009/09/to-upgrade-or-not-to-upgrade%e2%80%a6that-is-the-windows-7-question/comment-page-1/#comment-3741</link>
		<dc:creator>Amrou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://partnerit.com/?p=216#comment-3741</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the great insight, Greg. My only gripe about Windows 7 so far is that I miss my default Quick Launch toolbar and I don&#039;t like not having the &quot;Show Desktop&quot; button readily available on my taskbar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great insight, Greg. My only gripe about Windows 7 so far is that I miss my default Quick Launch toolbar and I don&#8217;t like not having the &#8220;Show Desktop&#8221; button readily available on my taskbar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: felish</title>
		<link>http://partnerit.com/2009/09/to-upgrade-or-not-to-upgrade%e2%80%a6that-is-the-windows-7-question/comment-page-1/#comment-3737</link>
		<dc:creator>felish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://partnerit.com/?p=216#comment-3737</guid>
		<description>Hey I like your glasses!  I will pass this article around my crib and see what they say....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey I like your glasses!  I will pass this article around my crib and see what they say&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
